|Statement||R. Murray Thomas and Ann Diver-Stamnes.|
|Series||Contributions in psychology -- no. 21.|
|The Physical Object|
|Number of Pages||172|
Contributions in Ethnic Studies: What Wrongdoers Deserve: The Moral Reasoning Behind Responses to Misconduct (Hardcover) Average Rating: () stars out of 5 stars Write a review R Murray Thomas; Ann Diver-Stamnes. Get this from a library! What wrongdoers deserve: the moral reasoning behind responses to misconduct. [R Murray Thomas; Ann Diver-Stamnes] -- This study analyzes the reasoning process through which individuals determine what consequences are appropriate for those who do wrong. The authors presented six cases of wrongdoing to a large number. First, what do wrongdoers deserve — to suffer? to be punished? something else? Second, what does it mean for them to deserve it? That is, what is the normative force or significance of valid desert claims, either with respect to retributivist desert in particular or with respect to all forms of desert? Define wrongdoers. wrongdoers synonyms, wrongdoers pronunciation, wrongdoers translation, English dictionary definition of wrongdoers. n. One who does wrong, especially morally or ethically. wrong′do′ing n. n the act or an instance of doing something immoral or illegal n. 1. wrong, evil, or.
A list of books you probably had to read in school. Whether we actually read them then, they deserve a second look! 1, users 2, views made by Michele RT. avg. score: 39 of (29%) required scores: 1, 18, 30, 41, 57 Trending Book Lists 'Big Fat Books Worth the Effort' 28, 20 Books Most People Lie About Reading. 40, The hard treatment is the vehicle through which the censure is expressed” (19). Of course, even theorists who accept that we are entitled to censure wrongdoers for their wrongdoings might nonetheless deny that criminal wrongdoers deserve to . Even though wrongdoers may deserve to have the book thrown at them, it is not always wise to exact the full measure of justice. There is evidence that prison turns people into career criminals. On. Punishing wrongdoers because they deserve it. All 3 theories that form the framework for Conrad's book suggest _____ is required but that we cannot lose sight of the _____ of offenders. punishment, humanity _____ transmit a culture's values and accepted codes of behavior, protect the in group from outsiders perpetuating the "us vs. them.
of affairs that wrongdoers deserve in virtue of their wrongdoing. Most commonly, he says, retributivists believe that what wrongdo ers deserve is 'to suffer', by which he means, I think, something much like 'to experience pain or anguish'. I agree that that is the dominant retributivist view.8 I do not, however, think it the best view. Some reject the claim that what wrongdoers deserve is suffering. Rather, they say, wrongdoers deserve a certain treatment or response -- to be punished-- and we are justified in responding in that deserved way. And those who accept suffering as wrongdoers' desert typically reach punishment's justifiability through the compound claim that. 1. Wrongdoers deserve punishment. 2. The more grave the wrongdoing, the more severe is the punishment deserved. 3. Some crimes are so grave that no punishment less than death would be proportionate in its severity. 4. Therefore, wrongdoers guilty of such crimes deserve death. 5. This book offers a comprehensive challenge to the retributivist conviction that our criminal legal institutions are justified because they mete out the suffering deserved by morally blameworthy wrongdoers. is a better and more just place when those who are morally culpable are condemned and given the hard treatment they deserve. A central.